To determine the meaning of 'resilience' as used in the passage, we need to analyze the context in which it's mentioned. The passage discusses the challenges faced by women in India, emphasizing their ability to overcome difficult situations and emerge stronger. The phrase mentioning resilience highlights a woman's capability to raise a family, find happiness, and maintain her sanity despite challenges, serving as 'fodder for exploitation'.
Therefore, the correct answer is 'Able to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions.' This accurately reflects the resilience shown by women as portrayed in the passage.
To solve this question, we need to understand the concept of the 'New Woman' as mentioned in the provided comprehension passage. The passage highlights how women have begun to break free from the societal limitations imposed on them. Let's analyze the context and reasoning to arrive at the correct answer.
In conclusion, the 'New Woman' as outlined in the passage is one who actively challenges and defies the socio-cultural restrictions placed upon her, striving for her rights and asserting her identity boldly.
The question asks us to identify the sign of women empowerment according to the author's perspective in the provided comprehension passage. To solve this, we need to consider the themes and statements made within the text.
The passage describes a journey towards empowerment for women, highlighting milestones like mobility, communication, independence, and a strong sense of self-worth. It emphasizes the transformation of women into individuals "pushing against the limits society imposed on her", defining themselves beyond traditional domestic roles.
The correct answer, "Seeking total liberation", aligns well with the passage's theme. Liberation here encompasses the notion of women breaking free from societal constraints, developing a distinct identity, and striving for equity and freedom in various facets of life.
Let's analyze why the other options are not the most suitable based on the passage:
Therefore, based on the context provided in the passage, "Seeking total liberation" is the most comprehensive and fitting answer depicting women empowerment according to the author.
Therefore, the best choice is: "She is courageously treading uncharted paths which are dreaded even by her male counterparts."
The question at hand is focused on identifying the most terrifying actuality regarding a girl child in present times. To arrive at the correct answer, we need to analyze the comprehension passage provided.
In the passage, several issues concerning the challenges faced by girl children are highlighted:
Given the context and emphasis in the comprehension passage, Gender Cleansing is presented as the most severe and pronounced threat or actuality affecting girl children today. This is due to its direct impact on the very existence and survival of girls, as highlighted by the skewed sex ratio figures.
Other options, although significant, do not have the same immediate existential threat that comes with gender cleansing. Therefore, the correct answer is:
Gender Cleansing
In summary, while all options represent serious issues faced by girl children, the passage clearly designates gender cleansing as the most terrifying actuality due to its direct impact on the life and demographics of girls.
The question requires us to identify the statement that is true according to the given passage. Let's examine the passage and evaluate each option:
After reviewing the passage and the options, it is clear that Option 2 is the correct answer, as it aligns perfectly with the passage's discussion on the role of cyberspace in women's modern-day expression and empowerment.
To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze the comprehension passage and the given options. The passage discusses various issues pertaining to gender inequality in India, particularly the challenges faced by girls and women in terms of societal bias and the fight for equality and empowerment.
To determine the central theme of the given passage, it is vital to analyze the content and structure closely. The passage highlights the journey and struggle of women towards empowerment in India. Key points raised include:
With these points in mind, let's evaluate the options provided:
Therefore, the central theme of the passage is best captured by the option: Celebrating the New Age woman who scripts her own success stories.
When people who are talking don’t share the same culture, knowledge, values, and assumptions, mutual understanding can be especially difficult. Such understanding is possible through the negotiation of meaning. To negotiate meaning with someone, you have to become aware of and respect both the differences in your backgrounds and when these differences are important. You need enough diversity of cultural and personal experience to be aware that divergent world views exist and what they might be like. You also need the flexibility in world view, and a generous tolerance for mistakes, as well as a talent for finding the right metaphor to communicate the relevant parts of unshared experiences or to highlight the shared experiences while demphasizing the others. Metaphorical imagination is a crucial skill in creating rapport and in communicating the nature of unshared experience. This skill consists, in large measure, of the ability to bend your world view and adjust the way you categorize your experiences. Problems of mutual understanding are not exotic; they arise in all extended conversations where understanding is important.
When it really counts, meaning is almost never communicated according to the CONDUIT metaphor, that is, where one person transmits a fixed, clear proposition to another by means of expressions in a common language, where both parties have all the relevant common knowledge, assumptions, values, etc. When the chips are down, meaning is negotiated: you slowly figure out what you have in common, what it is safe to talk about, how you can communicate unshared experience or create a shared vision. With enough flexibility in bending your world view and with luck and charity, you may achieve some mutual understanding.
Communication theories based on the CONDUIT metaphor turn from the pathetic to the evil when they are applied indiscriminately on a large scale, say, in government surveillance or computerized files. There, what is most crucial for real understanding is almost never included, and it is assumed that the words in the file have meaning in themselves—disembodied, objective, understandable meaning. When a society lives by the CONDUITmetaphor on a large scale, misunderstanding, persecution, and much worse are the likely products.
Later, I realized that reviewing the history of nuclear physics served another purpose as well: It gave the lie to the naive belief that the physicists could have come together when nuclear fission was discovered (in Nazi Germany!) and agreed to keep the discovery a secret, thereby sparing humanity such a burden. No. Given the development of nuclear physics up to 1938, development that physicists throughout the world pursued in all innocence of any intention of finding the engine of a new weapon of mass destruction—only one of them, the remarkable Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, took that possibility seriously—the discovery of nuclear fission was inevitable. To stop it, you would have had to stop physics. If German scientists hadn’t made the discovery when they did, French, American, Russian, Italian, or Danish scientists would have done so, almost certainly within days or weeks. They were all working at the same cutting edge, trying to understand the strange results of a simple experiment bombarding uranium with neutrons. Here was no Faustian bargain, as movie directors and other naifs still find it intellectually challenging to imagine. Here was no evil machinery that the noble scientists might hide from the problems and the generals. To the contrary, there was a high insight into how the world works, an energetic reaction, older than the earth, that science had finally devised the instruments and arrangements to coart forth. “Make it seem inevitable,” Louis Pasteur used to advise his students when they prepared to write up their discoveries. But it was. To wish that it might have been ignored or suppressed is barbarous. “Knowledge,” Niels Bohr once noted, “is itself the basis for civilization.” You cannot have the one without the other; the one depends upon the other. Nor can you have only benevolent knowledge; the scientific method doesn’t filter for benevolence. Knowledge has consequences, not always intended, not always comfortable, but always welcome. The earth revolves around the sun, not the sun around the earth. “It is a profound and necessary truth,” Robert Oppenheimer would say, “that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them.”
...Bohr proposed once that the goal of science is not universal truth. Rather, he argued, the modest but relentless goal of science is “the gradual removal of prejudices.” The discovery that the earth revolves around the sun has gradually removed the prejudice that the earth is the center of the universe. The discovery of microbes is gradually removing the prejudice that disease is a punishment from God. The discovery of evolution is gradually removing the prejudice that Homo sapiens is a separate and special creation.
As the post–World War II generation of liberal democratic leaders forged new, highly successful domestic and international institutions and policies throughout the West, the weaknesses of liberal democracy that dominated the two decades after World War II faded from view. But they did not go away.
First, because liberal democracy restrains majorities, it slows the achievement of goals that majorities support. This generates frustration with institutional restraints, and an unacknowledged envy of authoritarian systems that can act quickly and decisively. China can build huge cities in the time it takes the United States to review the environmental impact of small highway projects. Liberal democracy requires more patience than many possess. Second, liberal democracy requires tolerance for minority views and ways of life to which many citizens are deeply opposed. It is natural to feel that if we consider certain views or ways of life to be odious, we should use public power to suppress them. In many such cases, liberal democracy restrains this impulse, a psychological burden that some will find unbearable.
This leads directly to the third inherent problem of liberal democracy—the distinction it requires us to make between civic identity and personal or group identity. For example, although we may consider certain religious views false and even dangerous, we must, for civic purposes, accept those who hold these views as our equals. They may freely express these views; they may organize to promote them; they may vote, and their votes are given the same weight as ours. The same goes for race, ethnicity, gender, and all the particularities that distinguish us from one another.
This requirement often goes against the grain of natural sentiments. We want the public sphere to reflect what we find most valuable about our private commitments. Liberal democracy prevents us from fully translating our personal identities into our public lives as citizens. This too is not always easy to bear. The quest for wholeness—for a political community, or even a world, that reflects our most important commitments—is a deep yearning to which liberal leaders can always appeal.
Nor is the fourth inherent difficulty of liberal democracy—the necessity of compromise—easy to bear. If what I want is good and true, why should I agree that public decisions must incorporate competing views? James Madison gives us the answer: in circumstances of liberty, diversity of views is inevitable, and unless those who agree with us form a majority so large as to be irresistible, the alternative to compromise is inaction, which is often more damaging, or oppression, which always is.
Beware of the old newspapers
stacked
on that little three legged stool over there.
Don’t disturb them.
I know it for a fact
that snakes have spawned in between these sheets.
Don’t even look in that direction.
It’s not because of breeze
that their corners are fluttering.
It’s alive, that nest of newspapers.
new born snakes, coiling and uncurling,
are turning their heads to look at you.
That white corner has spread its hood.
A forked tongue
shoots out of its mouth.
Keep your eyes closed.
Get rid of the whole goddamn pile if you
want to
in the morning.
If the price of a commodity increases by 25%, by what percentage should the consumption be reduced to keep the expenditure the same?
A shopkeeper marks his goods 40% above cost price and offers a 10% discount. What is his percentage profit?