Question

Which of the following statements would the author agree with the most?

• A. The second law of thermodynamics states that things need more energy as they separate.
• B. When it comes to erosion, intangibles behave differently from tangible.
• C. Up-gradation is no longer an option but an obligation.
• D. Up-gradation though simple is disruptive.
• E. In the next thirty years, one’s experience in up-grading will be greatly valued.
• A. Life is like riding a bicycle. In order to avoid falling, you must keep moving.
• B. The only thing constant in life is change.
• C. You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
• D. If you do not change you will be changed.
• J. What we can’t cure we must endure.
• A. 1 or 3
• B. 1 or 4
• C. 2 or 4
• D. 3 or 4
• O. 1, 3 and 4

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Understanding the passage
The passage explains that everything, tangible or intangible, is subject to decay and breakdown without constant maintenance. In the digital era, this principle applies strongly to software, hardware, and technology in general. Maintenance and upgrading are not luxuries but necessities.

Step 2: Key point from the author
The author emphasizes that: - Keeping technology stable requires continual upgrades.
- If neglected, small delays accumulate, causing disruptive big changes.
- Upgradation is described as “a type of hygiene,” meaning it is a routine necessity, not optional.

Step 3: Eliminating wrong options
- (A) Mentions thermodynamics but the author uses it only as an analogy, not as the main argument. Wrong.
- (B) The author actually says both tangible and intangible things degrade. So wrong.
- (D) Disruptive, yes, but the author stresses inevitability, not simplicity. Wrong.
- (E) The author stresses that upgrades keep us newbies forever, not that experience will be valued. Wrong.


Step 4: Correct Option
Only (C) —

Up-gradation is no longer an option but an obligation — matches the author’s message fully.

Final Answer: \(\boxed{C}\)

Answer 2

The question asks us to identify the quote that best aligns with the author’s perspective. From the answer key, the author’s view emphasizes movement, persistence, and progress. Step 1: Understanding Option A
The quote compares life to riding a bicycle, where balance and stability can only be maintained through continuous movement. This reflects resilience, adaptability, and the need to keep going despite challenges.

Step 2: Analyzing the other options \begin{itemize} \item

Option B: “The only thing constant in life is change.” While true, this emphasizes inevitability rather than active effort. The author’s tone is more action-oriented. \item

Option C: “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” This is about individual responsibility, but the author stresses persistence rather than initiating moral change. \item

Option D: “If you do not change you will be changed.” This focuses on external consequences of inaction, not the forward momentum described by the author. \item

Option E: “What we can’t cure we must endure.” This emphasizes passive acceptance, which contrasts with the author’s idea of active perseverance. \end{itemize}

Step 3: Drawing the inference
The best match is Option A, since it captures the author’s belief in perseverance and continuous effort to avoid stagnation or failure.

Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{A. Life is like riding a bicycle. In order to avoid falling, you must keep moving.}} \]

Answer 3

Step 1: Evaluate Policy 1 — Life time employment.
While lifetime employment may provide job security, it often reduces motivation for continuous performance improvement. In a competitive technology environment, this would not be the best policy. Thus, this option is unlikely to be recommended.


Step 2: Evaluate Policy 2 — Promotion based on seniority.
Promoting purely on the basis of seniority overlooks competence and skills. In the technology sector, innovation and productivity matter more than time served. Hence, this policy does not align with efficiency and adaptability.


Step 3: Evaluate Policy 3 — Hire new competent employees and fire old incompetent employees.
This policy emphasizes maintaining a capable and efficient workforce. Incompetence hampers growth, so replacing underperforming employees with skilled ones supports productivity. This policy is practical and aligned with competitive corporate practice.


Step 4: Evaluate Policy 4 — Regular training and retraining.
Technology changes rapidly, and continuous training is essential to keep employees updated with the latest tools and innovations. Retraining ensures existing employees remain competent, which is a sustainable long-term policy. Thus, this is highly recommended.


Step 5: Conclusion.
From the above analysis, the author would most likely recommend Policy 3 (ensuring competence by replacing ineffective employees) or Policy 4 (investing in continuous learning and retraining).

Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{D. 3 or 4}} \]