Question

In which of the following landmark cases the advocate was held guilty of professional misconduct as he had forged the court order?

• A. Pratap Narain V. Y. P. Raheja
• B. Vikramaditya V. Smt. Jamila Khatoon
• C. Babulal Jain V. Subhash Jain
• D. Smt. P. Pankajam V. B. H. Chandrashekhar

Hint:

Forging a court order by an advocate is a serious professional misconduct, as seen in the case of Pratap Narain V. Y. P. Raheja.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

Step 1: Understanding the Question.
In the case of Pratap Narain V. Y. P. Raheja, the advocate was found guilty of professional misconduct for forging a court order.
Step 2: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (A) Pratap Narain V. Y. P. Raheja.