In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court observe that an order suspending internet services indefinitely is impermissible under the existing law, and any order suspending internet must adhere to the principle of proportionality and must not extend beyond the necessary duration?

Question

cdquestions Admin · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court, in this case, held that orders suspending internet services must follow the principle of proportionality. Such orders should not be indefinite and should be limited in duration to ensure that they do not violate citizens’ rights unnecessarily. The case reinforced the idea that restrictions on internet access should be temporary and justifiable under law.

Answer

Anurada Bhasin v. Union Of India AIR 2020 SC 1308

Answer

Subhash Desai v. Governor of Maharashtra 2023 SCC OnLine SC 607

Answer

Nabam Rebia & Bamang Felix v. Dy. Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly (2016) 8 SCC 1

Answer

Neeraj Chandra v. Union of India (2023) 5 SCC 1

Offenses	Sections
(A) Voyeurism	(1) Section 77
(B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman	(2) Section 79
(C) Stalking	(3) Section 75
(D) Sexual Harassment	(4) Section 78

(A) Conditions for a Hindu Marriage	(i) Section 13
(B) Registration of Hindu Marriage	(ii) Section 10
(C) Judicial Separation	(iii) Section 5
(D) Divorce	(iv) Section 8

I. Arbitration of excepted matters	1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386
II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses	2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066
III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz	3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943
IV. Arbitrability of fraud	4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222

I. Uti Possidetis	1. Principle in customary international law providing that where there has been a fundamental change of circumstances since an agreement was concluded, a party to that agreement may withdraw from or terminate it.
II. Pacta Sunt Servanda	2. Two or more states equally exercise sovereignty with respect to a territory and its inhabitants.
III. Condominium	3. Doctrine that territory remains with the possessor state at the end of war or occupation unless otherwise determined by a treaty or an agreement.
IV. Rebus Sic Stantibus	4. Proposition that treaties are binding upon the parties to them and must be performed in good faith.

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court observe that an order suspending internet services indefinitely is impermissible under the existing law, and any order suspending internet must adhere to the principle of proportionality and must not extend beyond the necessary duration?

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Top Questions on Administrative Law

Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam