Question:

In which case the Supreme Court held that Laws in the Ninth Schedule are not having any immunity from judicial review?

Show Hint

This case was pivotal in interpreting the relationship between fundamental rights and laws in the Ninth Schedule.
Updated On: Apr 15, 2025
  • Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P.
  • Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
  • I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
  • In Re Berubari case
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

In the case of I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), the Supreme Court ruled that laws in the Ninth Schedule are not immune from judicial review and can be challenged on grounds of violation of fundamental rights.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Judicial Reforms