Question:

In which case of the following, the validity of Article 323-A(2)(d) and 323- B(3)(d) of Part XIV-A entitled "Tribunals" inserted by the Constitution (Forty- Second) Amendment Act, 1976 was challenged whereby it was held that the Tribunals could not supplant the High Court especially in respect of judicial review and their decisions are amenable to jurisdiction of the Division Bench of the High Court under Article 226 and then assailable by way of special leave to the Supreme court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

Updated On: Aug 5, 2024
  • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597
  • Minerva Mills v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789
  • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918
  • L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (D): L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125
Was this answer helpful?
0
0