Question:
In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that fundamental rights cannot be waived?
In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that fundamental rights cannot be waived?
Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
- Gopala vs. State of Madras
- Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar
- Golaknath vs. State of Punjab
- Basheshar Nath vs. IT Commissioner
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
The landmark Supreme Court judgment in Golaknath vs. State of Punjab declared that fundamental rights are sacrosanct and cannot be taken away or abridged by any amendment to the Constitution.
Was this answer helpful?
1
0
Top Questions on Constitutional Laws
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Constitutional Laws
- Consider the following statements about Article 32 of the Constitution and select the correct answer:
I. The Article is silent about the locus standi regarding who may approach the Court.
II. The Article is silent about the opposite party against whom relief may be granted.
III. The Article creates scope for even a sixth type of writ.- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the Preamble is \(\textit{not}\) part of the Constitution?
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The President of India has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of an offence in cases where the punishment is by a Court Martial or where the sentence is death. Reason (R): This power under Article 72 overrides and completely nullifies the powers of the Governor to commute or remit a death sentence under State law.
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Under Articles 129 and 215, Supreme Court and High Courts are Courts of Record with contempt powers. What is true about the lower judiciary in this context?
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
- A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
Conclusions:
I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
Which one is correct?- AIBE - 2025
- Labour & Industrial Law
- If a bailiff executes an eviction based on a civil court order later declared void for lack of jurisdiction, what protection does Section 78 of the Indian Penal Code provide?
- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- Under Section 290(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, within how many days from the date of framing of charge can an accused file an application for plea bargaining?
- AIBE - 2025
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
- According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
- AIBE - 2025
- General Law
View More Questions