Question:

In the Nicaragua case (1986), the International Court of Justice ruled the following :
I. Upheld the justification of self-defence set up by USA.
II. Rejected the justification of self-defence set up by USA.
III. Intervention of USA in supporting the Contras’ rebellion was violative of customary international law.
IV. Intervention of USA in supporting the Contras’ rebellion was legally justified.

Updated On: Aug 4, 2024

I and IV
II and III
I, III and IV
II and IV

Hide Solution

Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (B):II and III.

Was this answer helpful?

0

0

Top Questions on Public International Law

Match the following

I. Uti Possidetis	1. Principle in customary international law providing that where there has been a fundamental change of circumstances since an agreement was concluded, a party to that agreement may withdraw from or terminate it.
II. Pacta Sunt Servanda	2. Two or more states equally exercise sovereignty with respect to a territory and its inhabitants.
III. Condominium	3. Doctrine that territory remains with the possessor state at the end of war or occupation unless otherwise determined by a treaty or an agreement.
IV. Rebus Sic Stantibus	4. Proposition that treaties are binding upon the parties to them and must be performed in good faith.

Select the correct option:

AILET LLM - 2025
Legal Studies
Public International Law

View More Questions

Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam

Match the following

I. Arbitration of excepted matters	1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386
II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses	2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066
III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz	3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943
IV. Arbitrability of fraud	4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222

Select the correct option

AILET LLM - 2025
Arbitration Law

View More Questions