Question:

In the following question, a statement is given followed by some arguments. Study the statement carefully and mark the correct alternative.
Statement : Should the Government introduce a system of obtaining bonds from students for working in India before sanctioning education loans for higher studies ?
Arguments :
I. No, this is not a workable solution and will obstruct the development of young talent in the country.
II. Yes, this is the only way to ensure use of the talent of our country for the development of the country and not only an individual.
III. No, this step will be too harsh.

  • Only argument I is strong
  • Only argument II is strong
  • Arguments I and II are strong
  • None is strong
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The problem requires evaluating the strength of three arguments regarding the statement on whether the government should require students to commit to working in India before being granted education loans. Here's a detailed analysis of each argument:
Statement: Should the Government introduce a system of obtaining bonds from students for working in India before sanctioning education loans for higher studies?
  • Argument I: No, this is not a workable solution and will obstruct the development of young talent in the country.
    This argument suggests that implementing such a bond system may hinder the growth and opportunities available for young professionals by limiting their employment options. It highlights potential negative consequences on individual growth, which are critical for personal and national development.
  • Argument II: Yes, this is the only way to ensure use of the talent of our country for the development of the country and not only an individual.
    Although this argument emphasizes national development, it overlooks the importance of individual freedom and the potential for talent to develop and contribute globally, which may indirectly benefit the home country as well.
  • Argument III: No, this step will be too harsh.
    This argument lacks detail. While implying that the measure is excessive, it does not provide substantial reasoning or consequences to support its claim.
In evaluating these arguments, Argument I presents a strong case as it underscores the impracticality and possible adverse effects on talent development. Argument II, while nationalistic, does not convincingly address the drawbacks of restricted freedom. Argument III lacks depth and specific reasoning.
Therefore, only Argument I is strong, making it the correct choice.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Statements and Arguments

View More Questions

Questions Asked in AILET exam

View More Questions