In the landmark case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4898, the Supreme Court of India examined the constitutionality of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Section 497 dealt with the offence of adultery. It was challenged on the grounds that it was discriminatory as it treated the husband as the aggrieved party and placed the wife as a mere object of adultery. Furthermore, it only allowed the husband of an adulterous woman to bring an action against the man involved, while the woman herself, or her husband, could not be prosecuted for adultery.
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 497 was unconstitutional because it violated the principles of gender equality and was arbitrary, thereby infringing upon the right to privacy and dignity guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. As a result, Section 497, IPC, was struck down.
Therefore, in this case, Section 497 of the IPC was declared unconstitutional.
Match List-I with List-II 
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the Preamble is \(\textit{not}\) part of the Constitution?
| I. Arbitration of excepted matters | 1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 |
| II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses | 2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066 |
| III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz | 3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943 |
| IV. Arbitrability of fraud | 4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222 |
| Offenses | Sections |
| (A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
| (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
| (C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
| (D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |