The maxim ‘Pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt’ is a principle in international law of treaties which translates to "agreements do not harm or benefit third parties." This principle implies that treaties are binding only on the parties involved in the agreement and do not impose obligations or confer rights upon non-parties, unless the third parties agree to such terms separately.
Thus, in the context of the given options:
Considering both explanations, the most comprehensive understanding of the maxim is captured by the option "Both (a) and (b)" as it encompasses both the binding effect of a treaty only on its parties and the non-imposition of obligations on non-parties. Thus, the correct answer is Both (a) and (b).
I. Uti Possidetis | 1. Principle in customary international law providing that where there has been a fundamental change of circumstances since an agreement was concluded, a party to that agreement may withdraw from or terminate it. |
II. Pacta Sunt Servanda | 2. Two or more states equally exercise sovereignty with respect to a territory and its inhabitants. |
III. Condominium | 3. Doctrine that territory remains with the possessor state at the end of war or occupation unless otherwise determined by a treaty or an agreement. |
IV. Rebus Sic Stantibus | 4. Proposition that treaties are binding upon the parties to them and must be performed in good faith. |
Offenses | Sections |
(A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
(B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
(C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
(D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |
(A) Conditions for a Hindu Marriage | (i) Section 13 |
(B) Registration of Hindu Marriage | (ii) Section 10 |
(C) Judicial Separation | (iii) Section 5 |
(D) Divorce | (iv) Section 8 |