Question:

In Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. Chief Minister, decided on 5th May 2021 it was held that

Updated On: Aug 4, 2024
  • Judgment in the case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India [1992 Suppl. (3) SCC 217] needs to be referred to larger bench
  • the Constitution (One Hundred and Second Amendment) is invalid
  • The 50% rule spoken in Balaji and affirmed in Indra Sawhney is to fulfill the objective of equality as engrafted in Article 14 of which Articles 15 and 16 are facets. 50% is Reasonable
  • The court held The Act, 2018 of Maharashtra did not violate the principle of equality
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (C):The 50% rule spoken in Balaji and affirmed in Indra Sawhney is to fulfill the objective of equality as engrafted in Article 14 of which Articles 15 and 16 are facets. 50% is Reasonable.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam

View More Questions