Question:
In 2020, at Dhorodo village, the Panchayat elections could not happen due to Covid pandemic while the tenure of the Panchayat was getting over that year itself. Mr. Haribansh, represented the people that year at the Panchayat post dissolution of the Panchayat tenure and made a law exercising the delegated power, vide the Panchayatiraj Act of the state to restrict their economic activities per day to 100 only. In which of the following case this is allowed or restricted?
In 2020, at Dhorodo village, the Panchayat elections could not happen due to Covid pandemic while the tenure of the Panchayat was getting over that year itself. Mr. Haribansh, represented the people that year at the Panchayat post dissolution of the Panchayat tenure and made a law exercising the delegated power, vide the Panchayatiraj Act of the state to restrict their economic activities per day to 100 only. In which of the following case this is allowed or restricted?
Updated On: Dec 23, 2024
- MCD vs. Birla Cotton Mills
- Patna University vs. Amita Tiwari
- Jalan Trading vs. Union of India
- None of these
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
The scenario described in the question is likely not covered by any of the landmark cases mentioned in the options. MCD vs. Birla Cotton Mills dealt with the scope of delegated legislation and the power of local authorities. Patna University vs. Amita Tiwari concerned issues related to university admissions and academic regulations. Jalan Trading vs. Union of India dealt with the validity of delegated legislation and the principles of natural justice. The specific situation of Mr. Haribansh exercising delegated powers in the absence of a duly elected Panchayat would likely require legal analysis based on the provisions of the relevant state Panchayati Raj Act and relevant case law.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Administrative Law
- In which of the following cases was it held that “the tribunal has unfettered jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute raised as well as to decide the legality of an order of the Central Government, or even the opinion of TRAI or any other expert body”?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Administrative Law
- Match the following offences with the corresponding Sections under BNS, 2023:Select the correct options:
Offenses Sections (A) Voyeurism (1) Section 77 (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman (2) Section 79 (C) Stalking (3) Section 75 (D) Sexual Harassment (4) Section 78 - AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Administrative Law
- Which of the following statement best captures the key difference between a Lok Adalat and Permanent Lok Adalat?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Administrative Law
- Which of the following statement best describes a social media intermediary?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Administrative Law
- Which of the following rights did the Supreme Court recognise for non-minorities in the T.M.A. Pai Foundation case (2002) 8 SCC 481 regarding the establishment and administration of educational institutions?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Administrative Law
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- Rent-Free Accommodation provided by an employer to an employee is:
- AIBE - 2024
- Tax Law
- Which of the following is/are included under the definition of employer given under The Industrial Relations Code, 2020?
(1) Occupier of the factory
(2) Contractor
(3) Manager of the factory
(4) Managing director of the factory- AIBE - 2024
- Labour & Industrial Law
- Malti, a small business owner, runs an online clothing store. Recently, she noticed that her website had been hacked, and her customers’ personal information, including names, addresses, and payment details, was stolen. Shortly after, some of her customers reported unauthorized transactions on their accounts. Malti wishes to file a complaint against the incident.
On the basis of the above problem select the correct option.- AIBE - 2024
- Cyber Law
- XYZ Textiles Ltd., a manufacturing company, recently terminated 04 workers without providing any compensation. The termination was because of the misconduct enquiry part of the worker. The company issued a show cause notice and the disciplinary enquiry was also conducted. On the basis of the recommendations of the committee, the services of these employees were terminated. The workers claimed the retrenchment compensation which was rejected by the management. Aggrieved by the rejection the workers have filed a complaint in the Labour Court under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Based on the above problem, select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2024
- Labour & Industrial Law
- Mr. X deposits ₹65,000 in a term deposit for 5 years with the Post Office to avail tax deduction under Section 80C. Assuming Mr. X does not opt for the concessional tax regime under Section 115BAC. What is the correct option?
- AIBE - 2024
- Tax Law
View More Questions