Step 1: Understanding the situation.
Alan's crop yield increased consistently for several years but dropped suddenly in 2008. The question asks for an explanation for this drop.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) Significant and consistent increases in the net yield of the crops from previous years eventually lead to the exhaustion of essential nutrients from the soil: While this is a possible explanation, the statement suggests a sudden drop, which may not be solely due to nutrient exhaustion.
- (B) Alan was diagnosed with diabetes in 2006 and didn't put in equally good effort this time to increase the yields: While this may be true, it is not the most plausible explanation for the sudden drop in yield.
- (C) Other farms also started using the same pesticides which led to a decreased efficiency of these pesticides: This could explain a gradual decrease, but it doesn't fully explain the sudden drop in 2008.
- (D) As a result of economic recession, the market size for the crops which Alan's farm produced shrank significantly: This is not the most likely explanation as it doesn't directly address the cause of the crop yield decrease.
- (E) The region where Alan's farm was located experienced a historic drought two years ago which led to decreased overall yield: This is the most plausible explanation because drought would have a lasting impact on crop yield, even years later.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Option (E) is correct because a drought two years ago would directly explain the drop in yield in 2008, even though Alan continued using the same pesticides.
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)