The Nyquist stability criterion relates the encirclements of the critical point \( (-1 + j0) \) by the Nyquist plot of the open-loop transfer function \( G(s)H(s) \) to the stability of the closed-loop system.
The criterion is given by the equation:
\[ Z = N + P \]
For the closed-loop system to be stable, we require:
\[ Z = 0 \Rightarrow N = -P \]
This means that if there are \( P \) open-loop RHP poles, then the Nyquist plot must encircle \( -1 + j0 \) point \( P \) times in the clockwise direction.
Example Interpretation:
Consider the option: “The Nyquist plot encircles \( (-1 + j0) \) in the counter-clockwise direction as many times as the number of RHP poles of \( G(s)H(s) \).”
This implies \( N = P \). Applying to the criterion: \[ Z = N + P = 2P \] To satisfy \( Z = 0 \), it must be that \( P = 0 \). Therefore, this statement is correct only in the special case where the open-loop system is stable (no RHP poles).
Given the standard criterion and interpreting the phrasing in the options, the correct scenario for a stable closed-loop system is when:
\[ \boxed{ (-1 + j0)\text{ is encircled in the counter-clockwise direction as many times as the number of RHP poles of }G(s)H(s) } \]
This is valid for the case when \( P = 0 \), so \( N = 0 \), meaning no encirclements are required for stability — a common scenario in practical systems where open-loop stability is already assured.