Question

If a Quasi-judicial authority violates the principles of natural justice, the appropriate writ would be

• A. Mandamus
• B. Habeas Corpus
• C. Quo warranto
• D. Certiorari

Hint:

A simple way to remember the key corrective writs: \textbf{Mandamus} commands an authority to \textit{do} something. \textbf{Prohibition} commands it to \textit{stop} doing something. \textbf{Certiorari} quashes something it has already \textit{done}.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks for the appropriate writ petition that can be filed to challenge an order of a quasi-judicial authority (like a tribunal or administrative body) on the ground that it has violated the principles of natural justice (e.g., the rule against bias or the right to a fair hearing).
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the purpose of the various writs: \begin{itemize} \item (A) Mandamus: (Latin for "we command") A writ issued to compel a public or quasi-public authority to perform a public duty that it has failed or refused to perform. It enforces action. \item (B) Habeas Corpus: (Latin for "to have the body") A writ issued to secure the release of a person who has been unlawfully detained. \item (C) Quo Warranto: (Latin for "by what authority") A writ issued to inquire into the legality of a person's claim to a public office. \item (D) Certiorari: (Latin for "to be certified") A writ issued by a superior court to a lower court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial authority, directing it to transmit the record of a case for review. The primary purpose of Certiorari is to quash (cancel) the order or decision of the lower body. It is issued on grounds of excess or lack of jurisdiction, error of law apparent on the face of the record, and violation of the principles of natural justice. \end{itemize} Since the goal is to nullify a decision made in violation of natural justice, the appropriate writ is Certiorari.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The appropriate writ would be Certiorari.