Grotesque is related to Macabre in a similar way as ________________
Show Hint
For analogy questions, first label the relation (e.g., “subcategory of,” “cause–effect,” “part–whole,” “contrast”), then eliminate options that don’t match that exact relation or that shift domains/registers.
Step 1: Identify the relation in the stem.
\textit{Grotesque} is a broad aesthetic/literary category describing the bizarre or distorted; \textit{macabre} is a \emph{specific type} within that sphere, focused on death and the grim.
\Rightarrow Relationship:
Specific kind (subcategory) within a broader category.
Step 2: Test each option against the same relation.
(A) Classics : Ruins — “Classics” is an academic field; “ruins” are physical remains. Not a subset relation within the same domain \Rightarrow \textit{reject}.
(B) History : Palaeontology — Both are disciplines, but Palaeontology is not a subset of History; it is primarily a branch of biology/geology dealing with fossils. Domain mismatch \Rightarrow \textit{reject}.
(C) Marriage : Funeral — Ceremonies of different kinds (social vs. mortuary); not a subcategory relation; if anything, loosely contrasting events \Rightarrow \textit{reject}.
(D) Sorcery : Necromancy — “Necromancy” is \emph{sorcery pertaining to the dead}; i.e., a
specific type of sorcery. This mirrors “macabre” (death-focused) as a specific type within the “grotesque” aesthetic. \Rightarrow \textit{fits perfectly}.
(E) Science : Thanatology — Thanatology (study of death) is interdisciplinary and can be scientific, but “Science” is vastly broader and of a different register than an aesthetic pair. The parallel is weaker than in (D) \Rightarrow \textit{reject}.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Only (D) preserves the “\emph{subtype within the same thematic domain}” relation found in the stem (Macabre \(\subset\) Grotesque \; just as \; Necromancy \(\subset\) Sorcery).
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{D. Sorcery is related to Necromancy}}
\]