Question:

Given below are two statements : Statement I : Law of similar is the fundamental law in the palliation of incurable states. Statement II : Kent’s ninth observation states that prolonged aggravation and final decline of patient demands palliative treatment. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below :

Show Hint

\textbf{Homeopathic Principles: Palliation vs. Cure.} While cure is the ultimate goal in homeopathy, the Law of Similars can also be ethically and effectively applied for palliation in incurable conditions to improve the patient's quality of life by addressing their specific symptom picture. Kent's observations guide the understanding of the remedy's action and prognosis.
Updated On: Apr 23, 2025
  • \( \text{Both Statement I and Statement II are correct} \)
  • \( \text{Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect} \)
  • \( \text{Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect} \)
  • \( \text{Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct} \)
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Statement I is correct: While the primary aim of homeopathy is curative, the Law of Similars can also be applied palliatively in incurable cases to alleviate suffering by selecting a remedy that matches the totality of the patient's symptoms, even if a complete cure is not achievable. The principle of "like cures like" can still provide relief. Statement II is incorrect: Kent’s observations describe various reactions following the administration of a homeopathic remedy. There is no specific "ninth observation" that states that prolonged aggravation and final decline demand palliative treatment in the conventional sense (i.e., non-homeopathic palliation). In homeopathy, even in cases of decline, the effort is to find the most similar remedy to ease suffering according to homeopathic principles, rather than resorting to purely allopathic palliative measures that do not consider the totality of symptoms or the vital force. Therefore, Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0