To determine the correctness of the given statements, we need to calculate the probabilities as mentioned in each statement and compare them with the provided values.
Statement I: A coin is tossed three times. The probability of getting exactly two heads.
The number of total outcomes when a coin is tossed three times is \(2^3 = 8\).
We need to find the number of ways to get exactly two heads. This can occur in the combinations: HHT, HTH, and THH.
The number of favorable outcomes is 3.
Thus, the probability is given by:
P(\text{exactly two heads}) = \frac{\text{Number of favorable outcomes}}{\text{Total outcomes}} = \frac{3}{8}
The statement is correct as the calculated probability matches the given probability \(\frac{3}{8}\).
Statement II: In tossing of 10 coins, the probability of getting exactly 5 heads is \(\frac{63}{256}\).
We use the binomial probability formula for this calculation:
P(\text{exactly } k \text{ heads}) = \binom{n}{k} \cdot p^k \cdot (1-p)^{n-k}
Where \(n=10\), \(k=5\), and \(p=\frac{1}{2}\).
Calculate \( \binom{10}{5} \):
\binom{10}{5} = \frac{10!}{5!(10-5)!} = \frac{10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 6}{5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1} = 252
Now, calculate the probability:
P(\text{exactly 5 heads}) = \binom{10}{5} \times \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^5 \times \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^5 = 252 \times \frac{1}{32} \times \frac{1}{32} = \frac{252}{1024} = \frac{63}{256}
The statement is correct as the calculated probability matches the given probability \(\frac{63}{256}\).
Thus, Both Statement I and Statement II are true.
Study the given pie charts carefully to answer the questions that follows
Pick the correct option to complete the following sentence.
The officer was pleased _____ the work his subordinate did.
”Although Babur and Humayun,–(i)– the Delhi Sultanate that ruled previously, had considered Delhi to be their capital, Akbar had shifted it to Agra. Forts, palaces and mausoleums of peerless grandeur came up in just a few years. Jahangir and in the early part of his reign, Shahjahan, continued to–(ii)– Akbarabad. But now, the Emperor wanted to build a fine new city for his–(iii)–, which would bear his name and outstretch the creation of his grandfather, in both splendour and scale”.
Choose the alternative which best expresses the opposite meaning of the underlined phrase in the following sentence.
You should not \(\underline{look\ down\ upon}\) those who are financially weak.