Question:
For an individual to be deemed resident in India in any previous year, one of the condition is:
For an individual to be deemed resident in India in any previous year, one of the condition is:
Show Hint
An individual is considered a resident in India if they stay for at least 182 days in the previous year.
Updated On: Oct 31, 2025
- If he is in India for a period of 182 days or more during the previous year.
- If he is in India for a period of 180 days or more during the previous year.
- If he is in India for a period of 181 days or more during the previous year.
- If he is in India for a period of 360 days or more during the previous year.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Question.
According to Section 6(1) of the Income Tax Act, an individual is deemed to be a resident in India for any previous year if they are in India for a minimum of 182 days during that year.
Step 2: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (A) If he is in India for a period of 182 days or more during the previous year.
According to Section 6(1) of the Income Tax Act, an individual is deemed to be a resident in India for any previous year if they are in India for a minimum of 182 days during that year.
Step 2: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (A) If he is in India for a period of 182 days or more during the previous year.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Income Tax Law and Accounts
- \(\textbf{Match List-I with List-II:}\)
\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{List-I} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Deposit in Sukanya Samriddhi Account} & \text{(I) 80E} \\ \hline \text{(B) Interest on loan for higher education} & \text{(II) 80D} \\ \hline \text{(C) Preventive health checkup} & \text{(III) 80GG} \\ \hline \text{(D) Rent paid for accommodation} & \text{(IV) 80C} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
Match List-I with List-II:
\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{List-I} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Sale of jewelry} & \text{(I) Income from Salary} \\ \hline \text{(B) Pension from former employer} & \text{(II) Capital gain/loss} \\ \hline \text{(C) Salary received from a partnership firm} & \text{(III) Income from other sources} \\ \hline \text{(D) Income from sub-letting of property} & \text{(IV) Profits and gains from business or profession} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
- Which of the following statements is incorrect?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
- Which of the following statements are true? (A) Agricultural income earned in India is exempted from tax
(B) Scheme of partial integration is available for individual, HUF, AOP, BOI or artificial judicial person
(C) For partial integration, net agricultural income of the individual assessee during the previous year should not exceed Rs. 5000
(D) For partial integration, non-agricultural taxable income should exceed the exemption limit- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
Match List-I with List-II:
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- Which section of BNSS facilitates trials and proceedings to be held in electronic mode?
- AIBE - 2024
- Criminal Law
- A new offense of 'Snatching' has been introduced by the BNS. Which section of the BNS defines 'Snatching' as an offense?
- AIBE - 2024
- Criminal Law
- Amit, intending to cause the death of Vijay, attacks him with a knife. Vijay sustains severe injuries and dies on the spot. The investigation reveals that Amit acted with the knowledge that his actions were likely to cause death. However, there is no evidence of premeditation or intent to murder Vijay.
Which of the following offenses has Amit committed?- AIBE - 2024
- Criminal Law
- As per Section 78(2) of the BSA 2023, presumption about the officer signing or certifying a document is?
- AIBE - 2024
- Law of Evidence
- Which word is inserted in Section 22 of the BSA that was not present in Section 24 of the Evidence Act?
- AIBE - 2024
- Law of Evidence
View More Questions