Question

Evaluate the role of pressure group in Indian democracy.

Hint:

For an evaluation answer, structure as: Define $\rightarrow$ Illustrate (types/examples) $\rightarrow$ Assess pros/cons $\rightarrow$ Suggest reforms $\rightarrow$ Balanced conclusion.

Answer 1

Step 1: Definition and constitutional basis.
A pressure group is an organized association that aims to influence policy; it does not seek governmental office. In India its activity is protected by Article 19(1)(a) (speech), 19(1)(b) (assembly), and 19(1)(c) (association), subject to reasonable restrictions.

Step 2: Types and examples (India).
\begin{itemize} \item Business/producer groups: FICCI, CII, ASSOCHAM.
\item Labor/peasant unions: INTUC, AITUC, BMS; farmers' unions (e.g., AIKS).
\item Professional/cause groups: Bar councils, teachers' associations, environmental groups (Chipko legacy, Narmada Bachao), RTI networks, women's and Dalit organizations.
\end{itemize}

Step 3: Channels and techniques of influence.
Lobbying and policy consultation; petitions/memoranda; public campaigns and media advocacy; litigation (PILs); strikes/bandhs/dharnas; expert input in committees; election-time scorecards/endorsements.

Step 4: Positive contributions (evaluation +).
\begin{itemize} \item Representation: Give voice to dispersed or marginalized interests between elections.
\item Information/expertise: Provide domain knowledge for better policies (e.g., GST consultations, environmental assessments).
\item Accountability/watchdog: Expose corruption/rights violations (RTI activism).
\item Political socialization & participation: Educate citizens, mobilize peaceful collective action.
\item Pluralism and balance: Prevent tyranny of the majority by counter-vailing organized interests.
\end{itemize}

Step 5: Limitations and risks (evaluation –).
\begin{itemize} \item Unequal power: Wealthy/business groups may capture policy; poor groups struggle for access.
\item Opacity: Lobbying remains weakly regulated; funding/transparency issues (including some NGOs).
\item Disruption: Strikes/bandhs can harm public interest; sectional demands may conflict with national priorities.
\item Foreign influence concerns: Necessitates oversight (e.g., FCRA) while safeguarding civil liberties.
\end{itemize}

Step 6: Reform suggestions.
Statutory lobbying register; mandatory disclosure of funding and meetings; broadening consultative processes; capacity support for weaker groups; codes for peaceful protest; strengthen parliamentary committee scrutiny.

Step 7: Concluding evaluation.
On balance, pressure groups are essential intermediaries that deepen deliberative democracy in India; with transparency and fair access, they complement parties and legislatures rather than undermine them.

Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{Pressure groups = organized influence; they enrich representation, expertise, and accountability, but need transparent, fair regulation to curb capture and disruption.}} \]