Each House of Parliament is the sole judge of lawfulness of its own proceedings and the validity of any proceedings of Parliament cannot be called in question on ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure. Under which provision of the Constitution of India has this been prescribed ?
The question pertains to the authority exerted by each House of Parliament over its own proceedings, as well as the ability to question the validity of such proceedings on procedural grounds. This is explicitly outlined under Article 122 of the Constitution of India.
Here's a breakdown of the relevant provisions:
Article 122(1): Courts are prohibited from inquiring into the validity of parliamentary proceedings on the grounds of any procedural irregularity. Thus, this emphasizes the sovereignty of parliamentary processes.
Article 122(2): Reiterates that no officer or member of Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court regarding any of their procedural decisions made within the parliamentary framework.
Therefore, the correct provision that prescribes that each House of Parliament is the sole judge of the lawfulness of its proceedings, and that these proceedings cannot be challenged on procedural irregularity grounds, is Article 122 of the Constitution of India.
Option
Article
1
Article 74
2
Article 84
3
Article 122
4
Article 124
By analyzing the function of these articles, it is clear that Article 122 is the most relevant to the context of parliamentary sovereignty over its proceedings.