Question

Due to the outcome of this case slum dwellers were benefitted

• A. N K Chanda V/s. State of Haryana
• B. Olga Tellis V/s Bombay Municipal Corporation
• C. P.V. Narasimharao V/s. Union of India
• D. Ratlam Municipal Council V/s. Vardichand

Hint:

The Olga Tellis case is a prime example of judicial activism and the expansion of Article 21. Remember it for the connection between the Right to Life and the Right to Livelihood, and its impact on the rights of the urban poor.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks to identify a landmark case that significantly advanced the rights of slum and pavement dwellers.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
In the case of Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986 SC 180, the Supreme Court dealt with the eviction of pavement and slum dwellers in Bombay. The Court made a groundbreaking interpretation of Article 21 (Right to Life).
- It held that the 'Right to Life' includes the 'Right to Livelihood'. The Court reasoned that for the poor, the easiest way to deprive them of their life is to deprive them of their means of livelihood.
- The Court ruled that pavement dwellers could not be evicted without the principles of natural justice being followed, meaning they had a right to be heard before eviction.
This judgment was a major victory for the urban poor and slum dwellers, as it recognized their fundamental rights and provided them with procedural safeguards against arbitrary eviction.

Step 3: Final Answer:
The case of Olga Tellis V/s Bombay Municipal Corporation directly benefitted slum dwellers by linking the right to life with the right to livelihood.