Question

Due to the outcome of this case slum dwellers were benefitted

• A. N K Chanda V/s. State of Haryana
• B. Olga Tellis V/s Bombay Municipal Corporation
• C. P V. Narasimharao V/s. Union of India
• D. Ratlam Municipal Council V/s. Vardichand

Hint:

Remember Olga Tellis as the "Pavement Dwellers Case." It's a key example of the Supreme Court's expansion of Article 21 to include socio-economic rights like the right to livelihood.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify the landmark case whose judgment primarily benefitted slum dwellers.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
In the case of Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985), also known as the "Pavement Dwellers Case," the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment regarding the rights of slum and pavement dwellers.
The case arose when the Bombay Municipal Corporation decided to evict pavement dwellers and demolish their dwellings. The Supreme Court held that the 'Right to Life' under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the 'Right to Livelihood'. The court ruled that although pavement dwellers could not claim a fundamental right to live on pavements, they must be evicted only after following a procedure established by law, and the eviction must be reasonable. It stated they should be provided with alternative accommodation before eviction. This judgment was a major victory for the rights of the urban poor and slum dwellers.
- (D) Ratlam Municipal Council case dealt with the municipality's duty to provide sanitary facilities and prevent public nuisance. While it benefitted residents, it was not specifically about the eviction of slum dwellers.
- (C) P.V. Narasimharao case dealt with parliamentary privilege and immunity from bribery charges.

Step 3: Final Answer:
The outcome of the Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation case directly benefitted slum dwellers by linking their right to livelihood with the right to life.