Doctrine of ‘indirect discrimination’ was analyzed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud in
- Lt. Col. Nitisha vs Union of India, Delivered on 25th March 2021
- Secretary, Ministry of Defence v Babita Puniya February 17, 2020
- Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 1
- Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. State of Kerala, 2018 SCC OnLine SCC 1690
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
The doctrine of ‘indirect discrimination’ was carefully analyzed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud in the case of Lt. Col. Nitisha vs Union of India, Delivered on 25th March 2021. This judgment is significant because it highlights the understanding and application of indirect discrimination within the legal framework.
Indirect discrimination occurs when a law or policy that appears neutral on the surface disproportionately affects a particular group. Justice Chandrachud’s analysis emphasized the importance of considering not just the intent behind a policy, but also its effects, ensuring that the laws do not disadvantage protected groups inadvertently.
The analysis in this case explained how policies, even if facially neutral, must be scrutinized on their impact to uphold the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Top Questions on Constitutional Laws
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Constitutional Laws
- Consider the following statements about Article 32 of the Constitution and select the correct answer:
I. The Article is silent about the locus standi regarding who may approach the Court.
II. The Article is silent about the opposite party against whom relief may be granted.
III. The Article creates scope for even a sixth type of writ.- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the Preamble is \(\textit{not}\) part of the Constitution?
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The President of India has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of an offence in cases where the punishment is by a Court Martial or where the sentence is death. Reason (R): This power under Article 72 overrides and completely nullifies the powers of the Governor to commute or remit a death sentence under State law.
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Under Articles 129 and 215, Supreme Court and High Courts are Courts of Record with contempt powers. What is true about the lower judiciary in this context?
- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
Questions Asked in AILET LLM exam
- Match the followingSelect the correct option
I. Arbitration of excepted matters 1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses 2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066 III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz 3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943 IV. Arbitrability of fraud 4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222 - AILET LLM - 2025
- Arbitration Law
- Which of the following statement is correct under the Mediation Act 2023?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Code of Civil Procedure
- In which of the following cases was it held that “the tribunal has unfettered jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute raised as well as to decide the legality of an order of the Central Government, or even the opinion of TRAI or any other expert body”?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Administrative Law
- Match the following offences with the corresponding Sections under BNS, 2023:Select the correct options:
Offenses Sections (A) Voyeurism (1) Section 77 (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman (2) Section 79 (C) Stalking (3) Section 75 (D) Sexual Harassment (4) Section 78 - AILET LLM - 2025
- Administrative Law
- As per the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, which of the following statement is false?
- AILET LLM - 2025
- Family Laws