Question

Direction: Read the following passage and answer the THREE questions that follow.
Interpretation in our own time, however, is even more complex. For the contemporary zeal for the project of interpretation is often prompted not by piety toward the troublesome text (which may conceal an aggression), but by an open aggressiveness, an overt contempt for appearances. The old style of interpretation was insistent, but respectful; it erected another meaning on top of the literal one. The modern style of interpretation excavates, and as it excavates, destroys; it digs “behind” the text, to find a sub-text which is the true one. The most celebrated and influential modern doctrines, those of Marx and Freud, actually amount to elaborate systems of hermeneutics, aggressive and impious theories of interpretation. All observable phenomena are bracketed, in Freud’s phrase, as manifest content. This manifest content must be probed and pushed aside to find the true meaning—the latent content beneath. For Marx, social events like revolutions and wars; for Freud, the events of individual lives (like neurotic symptoms and slips of the tongue) as well as texts (like a dream or a work of art)—all are treated as occasions for interpretation. According to Marx and Freud, these events only seem to be intelligible. Actually, they have no meaning without interpretation. To understand is to interpret. And to interpret is to restate the phenomenon, in effect to find an equivalent for it.
Thus, interpretation is not (as most people assume) an absolute value, a gesture of mind situated in some timeless realm of capabilities. Interpretation must itself be evaluated, within a historical view of human consciousness. In some cultural contexts, interpretation is a liberating act. It is a means of revising, of transvaluing, of escaping the dead past. In other cultural contexts, it is reactionary, impertinent, cowardly and stifling.
Which of the following BEST differentiates manifest content from the latent content?

• A. Manifest content is natural whereas latent content is cultural
• B. Manifest content is loaded whereas latent content is elusive
• C. Manifest content is apparent whereas latent content is hidden
• D. Manifest content is a superset whereas latent content is a subset
• E. Manifest content is obscure whereas latent content is lucid

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

The passage describes two types of content: manifest and latent. According to the passage, "All observable phenomena are bracketed, in Freud’s phrase, as manifest content. This manifest content must be probed and pushed aside to find the true meaning—the latent content beneath." This indicates that manifest content is what is readily visible or apparent, whereas latent content lies beneath and must be discovered through deeper analysis.

Given this understanding, we can evaluate the options:

• Manifest content is natural whereas latent content is cultural - This does not differentiate based on visibility.
• Manifest content is loaded whereas latent content is elusive - This does not address visibility.
• Manifest content is apparent whereas latent content is hidden - This option accurately reflects the passage, where manifest content is what is seen and latent content is what needs to be uncovered.
• Manifest content is a superset whereas latent content is a subset - This does not reflect the excavation process described.
• Manifest content is obscure whereas latent content is lucid - This is opposite of the described nature.

The correct answer is: Manifest content is apparent whereas latent content is hidden.