Consider the following morphological break-up of pfeifing produced by a simultaneous bilingual child. What phenomenon does this example indicate?
Step 1: Distinguish code-mixing vs. code-switching
- Code-mixing refers to inserting elements of one language into another at word or phrase level (e.g., Hinglish).
- Code-switching refers to shifting between languages based on context, discourse, or social setting.
Step 2: Analyze the example
Here, the child uses the German stem pfeife and attaches the English progressive morpheme -ing, creating the hybrid form pfeifing. This is not simple code-switching (contextual) or social code-mixing, but rather indicates that the child sees both languages as one integrated system of morphology.
Step 3: Theoretical support
In bilingual acquisition studies, simultaneous bilingual children often blend grammatical rules from both languages, suggesting a unitary linguistic system hypothesis.
\[
\boxed{\text{Answer: Understanding both languages as part of a single 'system' (C)}}
\]
Choose the option that correctly matches the names of scholars (P – S) in column X with the fields or approaches (i – iv) in column Y they are primarily associated with.
Here are two analogous groups, Group-I and Group-II, that list words in their decreasing order of intensity. Identify the missing word in Group-II.
Abuse \( \rightarrow \) Insult \( \rightarrow \) Ridicule
__________ \( \rightarrow \) Praise \( \rightarrow \) Appreciate
In the following figure, four overlapping shapes (rectangle, triangle, circle, and hexagon) are given. The sum of the numbers which belong to only two overlapping shapes is ________