Question

Complete the activity as per the instructions given below:
Group Discussion:
Imagine yourself as a participant in a group discussion arranged by an NGO working to promote swadeshi. The topic is ‘Traditional food provide more nutrition to the children as compared to the junk food’. There are two more participants and evaluator to share their views. Prepare a set of dialogues.

Hint:

In GD, listen, agree/disagree politely, and summarize key points.

Answer 1

Group Discussion: Traditional Food vs. Junk Food
Evaluator: Good afternoon, everyone. The topic is — “Traditional food provides more nutrition to children than junk food.” Let’s begin. Ramesh, you start.
Ramesh (Participant 1): Thank you, ma’am. Traditional Indian foods like dal, roti, sabzi, curd, and millet-based dishes are rich in proteins, fiber, vitamins, and minerals. They are balanced, homemade, and chemical-free, unlike junk food loaded with trans fats, sugar, and preservatives.
Sanket (Participant 2): I agree, but junk food is convenient and appealing to kids. Pizza and burgers give instant energy from carbs. Can’t we have both in moderation?
Ramesh: Moderation is ideal, but junk food lacks micronutrients. A child eating Maggi daily may face deficiency in iron or calcium, while ragi porridge or khichdi supports growth and immunity.
Priya (Participant 3): Exactly! Our ancestors thrived on seasonal, local grains. Junk food causes obesity and diabetes in kids. NGOs should promote school canteens serving traditional meals.
Evaluator: Strong points. Any counter-view?
Sanket: Yes — urban kids reject traditional food. We must modernize presentation — like millet pizza or quinoa burgers.
Ramesh: Innovation is good, but core nutrition must remain traditional. Let’s preserve swadeshi health!
Evaluator: Well concluded. Thank you.
- Participants: Ramesh (pro-traditional), Sanket (balanced), Priya (pro-traditional), Evaluator.
- Flow: Introduction → Arguments → Counter → Solution → Conclusion.
- Tone: Respectful, logical, swadeshi-aligned.