Capacitance $C$ of a parallel-plate structure is calculated as $20~\text{pF}$ using $C=\dfrac{\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r A}{d}$. The value is then measured using an ideal LCR meter (no cable-capacitance error). Which reading is likely to be correct?
Show Hint
Parallel-plate formula neglects edges; fringing always increases $C$ slightly, so a precise measurement is typically just above the calculated value.
Step 1: Ideal formula vs. real capacitor.
$C=\dfrac{\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r A}{d}$ assumes an {ideal} parallel-plate capacitor with uniform field and {no fringing}. Step 2: Account for fringing.
A real capacitor has edge (fringing) fields that add an extra capacitance $C_f>0$. Hence the actual capacitance is
\[
C_{\text{actual}} = C_{\text{ideal}} + C_f>C_{\text{ideal}}.
\]
Step 3: Choose the reading.
With $C_{\text{ideal}}=20~\text{pF}$ and an ideal LCR meter (no cable/parasitic subtraction needed), the measured value should be slightly {higher} than $20~\text{pF}$. The closest option is 20.5 pF. Final Answer: 20.5 pF