Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question tests pronoun case (who vs. whom), grammatical construction, and diction (idiomatic phrases).
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the errors in the original sentence (Option A):
1. Pronoun Case: The pronoun refers to the people performing the action "undertake." Therefore, it is the subject of the verb. The correct subject pronoun is who, not the object pronoun whom.
2. Diction/Idiom: While "pushed to the limits" is a valid idiom, other options might provide a more suitable phrase for a "tradition."
Now let's evaluate the options:
(A) Incorrect pronoun ("whom").
(B) This option corrects the pronoun to who. It uses a smooth construction, "who are willing to undertake." It also uses the idiom "pushed to the margins," which effectively conveys the idea of a tradition becoming less central or important. This is a very strong choice.
(C) Incorrect pronoun ("whom"). The adverb placement ("willingly" at the end) is also awkward.
(D) The phrasal verb "take over" is incorrect in this context; one "undertakes" an assessment. The phrase "also being part of" is an awkward and ungrammatical construction.
(E) Incorrect pronoun ("whom"). The idiom "pushed to the brim" is used for containers and is incorrect for describing a tradition.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Option (B) is the only choice that corrects all the grammatical errors of the original sentence. It uses the correct pronoun "who," employs a clear and standard grammatical structure, and uses an appropriate idiom ("pushed to the margins").
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)