“No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.”
Strong Argument – This presents a significant economic consequence. Loss of employment is a serious issue and must be considered in any policy decision.
“Yes, the firecracker manufacturers use child labour to a great extent.”
Weak Argument – While child labour is a grave concern, this argument lacks substantiation and seems generalized. It does not directly justify a ban and hence is considered weak.
“Yes, this will be a concrete step to reduce noise and air pollution.”
Strong Argument – This is a logical and environmentally relevant point. It supports the ban with valid reasoning focused on public health and sustainability.
“No, the use of firecrackers makes certain special occasions more lively and joyful.”
Weak Argument – This is an emotional appeal and does not hold against environmental and ethical concerns. It lacks practical strength.
Only I and III are strong arguments.
Select a figure from the given four alternatives which when placed in the blank space of the given figure would complete the pattern.