Question:

Because the lawyer's methods were found to be ------, the disciplinary committee ------ his privileges.

Show Hint

Pay close attention to trigger words like "because," "although," "therefore," and "despite." They provide crucial clues about the logical structure of the sentence and the relationship between its parts.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • unimpeachable...suspended
  • ingenious...withdrew
  • questionable...expanded
  • unscrupulous...revoked
  • reprehensible...augmented
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The sentence structure, starting with "Because," indicates a cause-and-effect relationship. The quality of the lawyer's methods (the cause) led to a specific action by the disciplinary committee (the effect).
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
A disciplinary committee takes action against a professional's privileges when there has been wrongdoing. Therefore, the first blank must be a word with a negative connotation, describing unethical or improper methods. The second blank must be a negative action taken against the lawyer's privileges, such as suspending or taking them away.
Let's analyze the options:
- (A) unimpeachable...suspended: "Unimpeachable" means beyond doubt or criticism (a positive word). This contradicts the negative action of "suspended".
- (B) ingenious...withdrew: "Ingenious" (clever) is positive and does not fit the context of disciplinary action.
- (C) questionable...expanded: "Questionable" fits the negative context, but the committee would not have "expanded" (increased) his privileges as a result.
- (D) unscrupulous...revoked: "Unscrupulous" means dishonest or without moral principles, a strong negative word. "Revoked" means to officially cancel or take back. This pair creates a perfectly logical cause-and-effect relationship.
- (E) reprehensible...augmented: "Reprehensible" (deserving condemnation) is a fitting negative word, but "augmented" (increased) is the opposite of the expected action.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The lawyer's dishonest ("unscrupulous") methods caused the committee to take away ("revoked") his privileges.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in GRE exam

View More Questions