Question

Bandh was held as illegal and unconstitutional in the case of

• A. Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab
• B. Bharat Kumar K Palicha v. State of Kerala
• C. K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala
• D. Kamadhenu v Food Corporation of India

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

In the field of Legal Studies, the question revolves around identifying the case where 'bandh' was declared illegal and unconstitutional. A 'bandh' refers to a general strike often organized for political reasons, which can disrupt everyday life and impact public order.

The correct case is Bharat Kumar K Palicha v. State of Kerala. In this case, the Kerala High Court addressed the legality of bandhs, emphasizing that bandhs violate the fundamental rights of citizens. They interfere with the movement of people and access to essential services, which are protected under Article 19 and other provisions of the Indian Constitution.

Given the options:

• Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab
• Bharat Kumar K Palicha v. State of Kerala (correct answer)
• K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala
• Kamadhenu v. Food Corporation of India

It is clear that in Bharat Kumar K Palicha v. State of Kerala, the court's judgment specifically targeted the nature of bandhs as unconstitutional attempts to enforce a complete shutdown of activities and services that infringe on personal liberties and freedom of citizens.