Assertion (A) states that ICl is more reactive than I2. The reactivity of a molecule often depends on the bond strength within it; weaker bonds tend to break more easily, leading to higher reactivity. The Reason (R) given is that the I-Cl bond is weaker than the I-I bond.
The I-Cl bond involves atoms of different electronegativities, which leads to a polar bond. In contrast, the I-I bond is a nonpolar bond between two identical iodine atoms. Generally, polarly bonded molecules, such as ICl, exhibit greater reactivity compared to nonpolar molecules like I2 because the polar bond is easier to break due to its inherent instability.
The assertion and reason can be analyzed as follows:
Therefore, the most appropriate answer is that Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Given below are two statements.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
A bob of heavy mass \(m\) is suspended by a light string of length \(l\). The bob is given a horizontal velocity \(v_0\) as shown in figure. If the string gets slack at some point P making an angle \( \theta \) from the horizontal, the ratio of the speed \(v\) of the bob at point P to its initial speed \(v_0\) is :