Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This sentence describes the social dynamics of a nuclear family living within a larger extended family structure. We need to select words that accurately describe this relationship and the resulting social pressure.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The first part of the sentence sets up a condition: the nuclear family has a certain relationship (\textit{first blank}) with a larger kinship group due to living together ("contiguous residence"). The second part describes the consequence: strong pressure to do something (\textit{second blank}) that helps everyone "get along."
- The first blank should describe the state of being part of a larger group. Words like "part of," "within," or "embedded in" make sense.
- The second blank should describe an action that promotes getting along. Words like "cooperate," "compromise," or "share" would fit.
Let's evaluate the options:
(A) nurtured among.. abstain: To "abstain" (refrain from doing something) doesn't logically lead to "getting along."
(B) excluded from.. compromise: If the family is "excluded from" the group, there would be no pressure to "compromise" with them. This is contradictory.
(C) embedded in.. share: This pair is a strong fit. If the nuclear family is embedded in (firmly fixed within) the larger group, there would be strong pressure to share resources and responsibilities, which is essential for "getting along" in a communal living situation.
(D) scattered throughout.. reject: If families are "scattered," the residence is not "contiguous." Also, pressure to "reject" relatives is the opposite of getting along.
(E) accepted by.. lead: While being "accepted by" the group is plausible, the pressure to "lead" doesn't automatically follow or guarantee that people will "get along." The pressure is more likely to be about conformity and cooperation.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The words "embedded in" and "share" create the most coherent and logical sentence describing the social pressures of communal family life.