Disclosure of prior association with the client and disclosure of any possible source of conflict of interest are crucial procedural safeguards to maintain objectivity and transparency. Acting in a fraudulent manner is clearly not a safeguard; it is the opposite. Providing peer-review of valuation can be a valuable safeguard to ensure the accuracy and objectivity of assessments. Therefore, options (3) and (4) are not procedural safeguards, making (A) the correct answer.
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]