To determine Gagan's liability, we apply the given legal principles.
Principle 1: Bailment involves delivering goods to another person, a Bailee, for a specific purpose, and the Bailee must return the goods once the purpose is fulfilled.
Principle 2: In bailment cases, the Bailee is obligated to take care of the goods similarly to how a person of ordinary prudence would handle their own goods of equivalent bulk, quantity, and value.
Facts Analysis:
Aparna, the Bailor, entrusted her goods to Gagan, the Bailee, for storage until she found a buyer. Gagan stored his own goods in the same warehouse. However, Gagan was careless by leaving the windows open, despite locking the main door. Thieves accessed the warehouse through these open windows, stealing both Aparna's and Gagan's goods.
Conclusion: Gagan's failure to secure the windows, despite taking measures to lock the door, demonstrates negligence. He did not act as a person of ordinary prudence because a prudent person would reasonably close both doors and windows to prevent theft.
Thus, according to the principles, Gagan is liable for damages as he did not ensure the same level of care for Aparna's goods as expected from a person of ordinary prudence under similar circumstances.
Correct Answer: Gagan is liable since he left the windows open which shows that he did not take as much care as a person of ordinary prudence.