Question

Amit, intending to cause the death of Vijay, attacks him with a knife. Vijay sustains severe injuries and dies on the spot. The investigation reveals that Amit acted with the knowledge that his actions were likely to cause death. However, there is no evidence of premeditation or intent to murder Vijay. Which of the following offences has Amit committed?

• A. Causing death by negligence under Section 304A of IPC
• B. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 of IPC
• C. Murder under Section 302 of IPC
• D. Culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 of IPC

Hint:

Murder requires deliberate intention to kill, while culpable homicide not amounting to murder involves knowledge that the act is likely to cause death but without intent.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Step 1: Understanding the difference.
The distinction between “murder” (Section 302) and “culpable homicide not amounting to murder” (Section 304) depends on the intention and premeditation of the act.
Step 2: Analysis of the case.
Amit acted with the knowledge that his act could cause death, but there was no evidence of premeditation or intent to kill Vijay. This fits the definition of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, Amit is guilty under Section 304 IPC, which covers acts done with knowledge of likely death but without intent to murder.