All Architects are Visionary. Some Visionary people are Designers. No Designer is a Lawyer. Which of the following conclusion necessarily follows?
I. Some Visionary people are not Lawyers.
II. Some Architects are Designers.
III. All Designers are Visionary.
Select the most appropriate option:
Show Hint
For syllogisms, carefully distinguish “all,” “some,” and “no” statements. Only logically certain conclusions are valid.
Step 1: Analyze statements —
All Architects ⊆ Visionary
Some Visionary ⊆ Designers
No Designer ⊆ Lawyer Step 2: Evaluate conclusions —
I. Some Visionary are not Lawyers → True, as Designers (who are Visionary) are not Lawyers.
II. Some Architects are Designers → Not necessarily true; no direct connection between Architects and Designers.
III. All Designers are Visionary → Not necessarily true; only some Visionary are Designers. Step 3: Conclusion — Only I follows.