The question asks to identify the person least likely to be part of a self-help network based on the information provided in the passage regarding minority business ownership and the role of self-help networks.
To solve this question, let's analyze each option in the context of the passage:
Therefore, the person least likely to be part of a self-help network is the entrepreneur's banker, as entrepreneurs tend to rely more on family and community networks rather than external commercial banking resources.
To determine which option best exemplifies a self-help support network based on the passage provided, let's analyze the key concepts from the passage:
Now, let's evaluate each option:
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is the option that depicts a self-help network providing direct support and training within a close community group, matching the characteristics of mutual concern and cooperation described in the passage:
Correct Answer: A neighborhood-based fraternal organization develops a program of on-the-job training for its members and their friends.
The given question requires us to identify the statement best supported by the passage. To do this, we must analyze the passage and match its key points with the given options.
In the given passage, we are asked to determine the contribution of self-help networks to a minority-owned business once it is established. To find the correct solution, we need to analyze the passage focusing on the roles and characteristics of self-help networks.
The passage explains that minority business ownership depends significantly on social-group resources, indicating a group-level approach. Importantly, these self-help networks provide several kinds of support:
Among the options provided, the correct answer is:
This is because the passage highlights the role of community support, including a clientele network originating from the entrepreneur's ethnic group, which directly aids in the business's customer acquisition and retention.
Let's evaluate the other options:
Thus, the reasoning aligns with the correct choice, highlighting the network's role in establishing business contacts with potential customers within the minority community.
The question requires us to identify the focus areas that traditional analyses of minority businesses are least likely to examine as per the given passage. Let's analyze the options based on the passage provided:
Based on the above reasoning, the correct answer is that traditional analyses of minority business are least likely to "Examine businesses primarily in their social contexts". This aligns with the passage, which contrasts the sociological analysis's group and social network focus with the traditional approach.
The given passage discusses the role of social-group resources, specifically support networks, in the development of minority business enterprises. It illustrates how minority groups often depend on kinship and community ties, providing examples such as rotating credit associations and other ethnic-directed financial institutions.
To answer the question about the Irish building and loan associations, let's analyze the options:
Based on the detailed examination of the passage, the option that can be inferred about Irish building and loan associations is: They contributed to the employment of many Irish construction workers. This conclusion is consistent with the information in the passage regarding the function and impact of these associations.
To determine which statement is NOT correct based on the given passage, we must evaluate each option carefully against the information provided in the passage:
Based on the analysis of each option, the statement that is NOT correct according to the passage is Option 4.
The question asks us to identify the contention made by the sociological analysis regarding minority business ownership, as described in the passage.
Let's rule out the incorrect options:
Therefore, the assertion aligns with the passage's presentation of how minority business ownership relies significantly on social-group resources for support and development.
The question pertains to comprehending specific details from a passage focusing on minority business entrepreneurship and their reliance on various financial resources. The key objective is to identify the statement about small-scale individual entrepreneurs that aligns with the passage's assertions.
Let's analyze the given options against the passage:
Conclusion: Based on the analysis, the correct answer is that small-scale individual entrepreneurs "Actually avoid banks because they assume that commercial institutions charge unreasonably high interest rates." This aligns with the passage's assertion about their reservation towards commercial financial institutions due to perceived high interest rates.


When people who are talking don’t share the same culture, knowledge, values, and assumptions, mutual understanding can be especially difficult. Such understanding is possible through the negotiation of meaning. To negotiate meaning with someone, you have to become aware of and respect both the differences in your backgrounds and when these differences are important. You need enough diversity of cultural and personal experience to be aware that divergent world views exist and what they might be like. You also need the flexibility in world view, and a generous tolerance for mistakes, as well as a talent for finding the right metaphor to communicate the relevant parts of unshared experiences or to highlight the shared experiences while demphasizing the others. Metaphorical imagination is a crucial skill in creating rapport and in communicating the nature of unshared experience. This skill consists, in large measure, of the ability to bend your world view and adjust the way you categorize your experiences. Problems of mutual understanding are not exotic; they arise in all extended conversations where understanding is important.
When it really counts, meaning is almost never communicated according to the CONDUIT metaphor, that is, where one person transmits a fixed, clear proposition to another by means of expressions in a common language, where both parties have all the relevant common knowledge, assumptions, values, etc. When the chips are down, meaning is negotiated: you slowly figure out what you have in common, what it is safe to talk about, how you can communicate unshared experience or create a shared vision. With enough flexibility in bending your world view and with luck and charity, you may achieve some mutual understanding.
Communication theories based on the CONDUIT metaphor turn from the pathetic to the evil when they are applied indiscriminately on a large scale, say, in government surveillance or computerized files. There, what is most crucial for real understanding is almost never included, and it is assumed that the words in the file have meaning in themselves—disembodied, objective, understandable meaning. When a society lives by the CONDUITmetaphor on a large scale, misunderstanding, persecution, and much worse are the likely products.
Later, I realized that reviewing the history of nuclear physics served another purpose as well: It gave the lie to the naive belief that the physicists could have come together when nuclear fission was discovered (in Nazi Germany!) and agreed to keep the discovery a secret, thereby sparing humanity such a burden. No. Given the development of nuclear physics up to 1938, development that physicists throughout the world pursued in all innocence of any intention of finding the engine of a new weapon of mass destruction—only one of them, the remarkable Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, took that possibility seriously—the discovery of nuclear fission was inevitable. To stop it, you would have had to stop physics. If German scientists hadn’t made the discovery when they did, French, American, Russian, Italian, or Danish scientists would have done so, almost certainly within days or weeks. They were all working at the same cutting edge, trying to understand the strange results of a simple experiment bombarding uranium with neutrons. Here was no Faustian bargain, as movie directors and other naifs still find it intellectually challenging to imagine. Here was no evil machinery that the noble scientists might hide from the problems and the generals. To the contrary, there was a high insight into how the world works, an energetic reaction, older than the earth, that science had finally devised the instruments and arrangements to coart forth. “Make it seem inevitable,” Louis Pasteur used to advise his students when they prepared to write up their discoveries. But it was. To wish that it might have been ignored or suppressed is barbarous. “Knowledge,” Niels Bohr once noted, “is itself the basis for civilization.” You cannot have the one without the other; the one depends upon the other. Nor can you have only benevolent knowledge; the scientific method doesn’t filter for benevolence. Knowledge has consequences, not always intended, not always comfortable, but always welcome. The earth revolves around the sun, not the sun around the earth. “It is a profound and necessary truth,” Robert Oppenheimer would say, “that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them.”
...Bohr proposed once that the goal of science is not universal truth. Rather, he argued, the modest but relentless goal of science is “the gradual removal of prejudices.” The discovery that the earth revolves around the sun has gradually removed the prejudice that the earth is the center of the universe. The discovery of microbes is gradually removing the prejudice that disease is a punishment from God. The discovery of evolution is gradually removing the prejudice that Homo sapiens is a separate and special creation.