In the context of reservations for in-service candidates in postgraduate medical courses, the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has deliberated on the authority responsible for making such decisions. The Supreme Court has recognized that education, being a subject in the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution, allows both the Union and State Governments to legislate on matters concerning education, including medical education.
Upon reviewing various policies and governance frameworks, the Supreme Court affirmed that the power to provide reservations, including for in-service candidates at the postgraduate medical level, lies primarily with the State Governments. This decision underscores the autonomy and discretion bestowed upon the states to formulate policies that cater to local and regional needs within the ambit of constitutional provisions.
Thus, among the given options, it is the State Government that possesses the authority to make reservations for in-service candidates in postgraduate medical courses. This decision aligns with the broader principles of federal structure and decentralization, crucial components of governance in India.
Match List-I with List-II 
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the Preamble is \(\textit{not}\) part of the Constitution?
| I. Arbitration of excepted matters | 1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 |
| II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses | 2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066 |
| III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz | 3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943 |
| IV. Arbitrability of fraud | 4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222 |
| Offenses | Sections |
| (A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
| (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
| (C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
| (D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |