Step 1: Analyzing the passage.
The passage indicates that West Egg has more mansions per capita than East Egg, and the demolitions mentioned do not affect the conclusion. The comparison is based on mansions per capita, so the conclusion should follow that West Egg has more mansions relative to its population.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (A) This statement is not necessarily true because the passage doesn't discuss the condition of all the mansions, only that dilapidated ones were demolished.
- (B) This is not supported by the passage, as the comparison is about mansions per capita, not total mansions.
- (C) This is correct because it is directly supported by the information in the passage.
- (D) This option is incorrect because the passage does not suggest that West Egg and East Egg have the same number of mansions.
- (E) The number of residents is not relevant to the comparison of mansions per capita.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as the passage compares the mansions per capita in West Egg and East Egg.
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)