Step 1: Understanding the given information.
The passage compares the number of mansions per capita in West Egg and East Egg, stating that West Egg has more mansions per capita last year. This suggests that despite demolition, West Egg continues to have a higher number of mansions relative to its population.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (A) This option is likely true but doesn't directly follow from the passage.
- (B) This option is not necessarily true because the passage doesn't provide direct information about the total number of mansions in both areas.
- (C) This is supported by the passage as it explicitly mentions that West Egg has more mansions per capita.
- (D) This is not necessarily true, as the passage doesn't claim the two areas have the same number of mansions.
- (E) This is not supported by the passage, which does not mention the total number of residents in each area.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C) because the passage directly states that West Egg has more mansions per capita than East Egg.
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)