Question:

A town was faced with the problem of an excessive number of rats. To solve this, the town started offering a financial reward for every rat killed, which was to be proved by showing the severed tail of the rat.
Which of the following facts, if true, would be an argument in favour of the town’s policy?

  • Merely cutting off the tail of a rat does not stop that rat from surviving and producing more rats
  • Once the tail of a rat is cut off, the rat cannot survive
  • Cutting off tails is an inhumane way to solve the problem
  • None of the above
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The correct option is (B): Once the tail of a rat is cut off, the rat cannot survive
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Statements and Arguments

View More Questions

Questions Asked in AILET exam

View More Questions