Question

A statement is given below, followed by four arguments numbered (I), (II), (III), and (IV). Decide which of the following arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments. Choose the answer from the alternatives given below: Statement: Should ‘literacy’ be the minimum criterion for becoming a voter in India? Arguments:

• A. No, more literacy is no guarantee of political maturity of an individual.
• B. Only (I) and (II) are strong.
• C. Only (I), (II), and (IV) are strong.
• D. Only (I), (III), and (IV) are strong.

Hint:

In logical reasoning questions involving arguments, a ‘strong’ argument is one that is logical, relevant, and has a rational basis—legal, ethical, or factual. Avoid emotional or unsubstantiated claims.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

To evaluate whether ‘literacy’ should be a criterion for voting, we analyze each argument: - Argument (I) is strong: It logically highlights that literacy does not ensure political awareness or maturity. Many literate individuals may still vote irrationally or emotionally. - Argument (II) is weak: There is no direct or proven correlation that literacy reduces corruption. Corruption is more systemic and influenced by governance, not just voter literacy. - Argument (III) is strong: It appeals to the fundamental constitutional principle that voting is a right of every citizen, regardless of literacy. This is a strong legal and ethical point. - Argument (IV) is strong: Although slightly debatable, it provides a valid concern that lack of literacy might affect decision-making ability in a democratic process. It's an opinion supported by a rational premise. Hence, arguments (I), (III), and (IV) are strong.