Question:

A number of scientists have published articles ------ global warming, stating ------ that there is no solid scientific evidence to support the theory that the Earth is warming because of increases in greenhouse gases.

Show Hint

Use the latter part of the sentence to define the words needed for the blanks. The clause "stating that there is no solid scientific evidence" is the key to understanding the scientists' position and tone.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • debunking...categorically
  • rejecting...paradoxically
  • deploring...optimistically
  • dismissing...hesitantly
  • proving...candidly
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The sentence describes the content and tone of scientific articles about global warming. The second part of the sentence, "stating... that there is no solid scientific evidence," clarifies the position of these scientists. They are arguing against the theory.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The first blank must be a word that means arguing against or disproving. The second blank must be an adverb that describes the confident manner in which they are making this claim.
Let's analyze the options:
- (A) debunking...categorically: To "debunk" is to expose the falseness of an idea. To state something "categorically" is to state it in an absolute, unqualified way. This pair perfectly matches the context of scientists confidently asserting there is no evidence for a theory.
- (B) rejecting...paradoxically: "Rejecting" fits, but "paradoxically" (in a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory way) does not fit the tone of a scientific declaration.
- (C) deploring...optimistically: "Deploring" (expressing strong disapproval of) is less about scientific argument and more about emotion. "Optimistically" does not fit the context.
- (D) dismissing...hesitantly: "Dismissing" fits, but "hesitantly" contradicts the strong stance described in the rest of the sentence.
- (E) proving...candidly: "Proving" is the opposite of the scientists' position, as they are arguing there is no evidence.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The scientists are publishing articles "debunking" the theory and stating "categorically" that no evidence supports it.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in GRE exam

View More Questions