Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question presents a scenario that is a classic illustration of a general exception in the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The core concept is an act done by accident, without any criminal intention or knowledge.
Step 2: Key Legal Provision:
Chapter IV of the IPC deals with "General Exceptions." These are situations where an act, which would otherwise be an offence, is not considered an offence.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
The scenario described is almost a direct reproduction of the illustration given in Section 80 of the IPC.
- Section 80 of IPC is titled "Accident in doing a lawful act." It states that nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution. The illustration to this section is: "A is at work with a hatchet; the head flies off and kills a man who is standing by. Here, if there was no want of proper caution on the part of A, his act is excusable and not an offence." This perfectly matches the question.
- Section 84 of IPC deals with the act of a person of unsound mind.
- Section 81 of IPC deals with an act likely to cause harm, but done without criminal intent and to prevent other harm (doctrine of necessity).
- Section 85 of IPC deals with an act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The principle that an accidental act done with proper caution is not an offence is contained in Section 80 of the IPC.
A glance over all the Sections related to extortion would reveal a clear distinction being carried out between the actual commission of extortion and the process of putting a person in fear for the purpose of committing extortion. Section 383 defines extortion, the punishment therefor is given in Section 384. Sections 386 and 388 provide for an aggravated form of extortion. These sections deal with the actual commission of an act of extortion, whereas Sections 385, 387 and 389 IPC seek to punish for an act committed for the purpose of extortion even though the act of extortion may not be complete and property not delivered. It is in the process of committing an offence that a person is put in fear of injury, death or grievous hurt. Section 387 IPC provides for a stage prior to committing extortion, which is putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt ’in order to commit extortion’, similar to Section 385 IPC. Hence, Section 387 IPC is an aggravated form of 385 IPC, not 384 IPC. Having deliberated upon the offence of extortion and its forms, we proceed to analyze the essentials of both Sections, i.e.,383 and 387 IPC, the High Court dealt with.
(Extracted from Balaji Traders v. State of UP, 2025 INSC 806)