Step 1: Recall Section 19
Under Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, a contract is voidable if consent is obtained through coercion, undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation.
Step 2: Analyze options
A) Free consent: A contract with free consent is valid, not voidable (Section 14).
B) Consideration: A valid contract requires consideration (Section 25), but it doesn't make it voidable.
C) Coercion: Consent obtained by coercion (Section 15) makes the contract voidable at the option of the coerced party.
D) Lawful object: A contract with an unlawful object is void (Section 23), not voidable.
Step 3: Conclusion
The correct answer is (3) Coercion, as it renders a contract voidable.
Principle: A minor cannot enter into a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Facts: Anil, aged 16, agrees to sell his bicycle to Bharat for Rs 5,000. Bharat pays the amount, but Anil refuses to deliver the bicycle. Can Bharat enforce the contract?
Principle: A person is liable for the tort of negligence if they fail to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another.
Facts: Ram, a driver, was driving at 80 km/h in a residential area with a speed limit of 40 km/h. He hits a pedestrian, Shyam, causing injury. Is Ram liable?
A contract is formed when one party makes an offer and the other party accepts it. If A offers to sell his car to B for 5 lakh, and B agrees but later refuses to pay, what is the legal consequence?
In tort law, the principle of `res ipsa loquitur' refers to: